User talk:Laurentius

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Laurentius!

OTRS Userbox[edit]

Hi, please add {{User OTRS}} to your userpage, so everyone could verify that you are an OTRS member, thank you.   ■ MMXX  talk  18:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]


quella foto ha il nome sbagliato me l'hanno gia fatto notare.. Per questo venne cambiata la descrizione.. -- 15:30, 3 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Lard Buurman[edit]

Questo file non è stato incluso nella verifica OTRS: File:OpeningenIMG 0912.jpg. Grazie. --M.casanova (talk) 15:56, 4 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Grazie. Per l'altro materiale è stata inviata liberatoria via email il 2 settembre. --M.casanova (talk) 17:08, 4 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Salve. Avendo già ottenuto ticket #2011083010003771 per caricamento di immagini, vorrei sapere se è possibile inserire direttamente PermissionOTRS|id=... nel template creato. Grazie.--M.casanova (talk) 11:18, 6 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Categoria COSV[edit]

Salve. Giorni fa ho aggiunto 91 immagini alla categoria COSV e in totale come utente ne vedo 161; gli utenti non registrati però ne vedono solo 70 (primo caricamento). È necessario controllo/approvazione da parte di qualcuno perché le immagini aggiunte siano visibili anche agli utenti non registrati? Grazie. --M.casanova (talk) 09:52, 18 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Con action=purge la situazione si è sistemata, ma erano ancora 70 elementi per gli anonimi:
  • partendo con cache locale vuota e visualizzando la categoria come anonimo erano indicati 70 elementi;
  • dopo accesso diventavano 161;
  • dopo logout rimanevano 161, ma riaprendolo come anonimo con cache locale vuota erano di nuovo 70 (????).
L'importante comunque è che adesso sia tutto sistemato. Molte grazie. --M.casanova (talk) 10:55, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OTRS Noticeboard[edit]

Hi, We have new request in OTRS noticeboard about this ticket. please, check it.--MehdiTalk 03:49, 20 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]


I see you are adding ticket:2011101310013458 to many images from Category:Doual'art, like here. Unfortunately ticket:2011101310013458 is only applicable to text not images. See the OTRS message: "I agree to publish all texts under the free license Creative Commons attribution share alike - all (project descriptions, biographies, description of artworks). This documentation is made available to contribute to WikiAfrica. Please note that at the moment the images belong to the artists and they are not in CC BY-SA unless differently stated in the website." (emphasis is mine). So at the moment there is no proof that any images using this ticket are released under CC license. I think the OTRS ticket information should be removed from those images and we should seek permission from the photographers like Lard Buurman, or delete the images. --Jarek Tuszynski (talk) 12:40, 6 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for clarifying this, I do not know how I have missed the earlier email on this ticket. I guess I am not used to tickets that have 2 permissions bundled in one (text from a website and images from a photographer). So all the photographs by Lard Buurman are OK. The only problem is with photographs by other photographers, like Category:Photos by Sandrine Dole or Category:Photographs by Paulin Tchuenbou‎. About 400 of them use the ticket:2011101310013458, which was added by other users on the upload time. --Jarek Tuszynski (talk) 16:41, 6 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks, I can easily remove ticket:2011101310013458 from non Lard Buurman images with my bot, if that helps. We will probably need OTRS emails from other photographers, like Sandrine Dole or Paulin Tchuenbou‎, or at least some place online where they state the license of their images. --Jarek Tuszynski (talk) 11:42, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Metro rome.svg[edit]

File:Metro rome.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Friedrichstrasse (talk) 14:35, 11 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Foto Cobis[edit]

Ciao, per piacere correggi l'autore e firmati nelle foto dell'evento Cobis da te scattate, per formalizzare l'autorizzazione datami. :) --Nemo 11:37, 16 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Borse Alessio Guidetti per Wikimania 2016[edit]

Wikimedia Italia-logo.svg
Ciao, un messaggio dalla Commissione Borse Alessio Guidetti

Ciao, come forse saprai quest'anno Wikimania, il raduno annuale delle comunità Wikimedia, si terrà a Esino Lario (Lecco) dal 22 al 28 giugno.

Come per le scorse edizioni dell'evento, anche per il 2016 l'associazione Wikimedia Italia intende rendere disponibili alcune borse di partecipazione.
Potete trovare il bando di partecipazione con tutti i dettagli a questo link.
La scadenza è il 30 aprile 2016, ore 23:59 CEST.

Trovate invece tutte le informazioni su Wikimania Esino Lario sul sito ufficiale dell'evento
Grazie, e un sincero augurio di buon lavoro e buon divertimento sull'enciclopedia libera :-)

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da queste liste

Alexmar983 11:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Hi! I just got your message, and assuming that google-translate is working properly, you apparently need my mailing address to send a book? Thank you! Please email me at and I can give you my mailing address :) Victorgrigas (talk) 16:38, 25 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Hi, According to the message you posted to my page, please e-mail me to henry(at) for the postal address. Greetings --Hamster28 (talk) 17:55, 25 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

RE: Un grazie per WLM e un libro sulla conoscenza libera per te[edit]

Hi! How are you? Where can I send you my adress? By e-mail? Tournasol7 (talk) 22:34, 25 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

RE: Un grazie per WLM e un libro sulla conoscenza libera per te[edit]

Hello and thank you for the kind gift. However, since I do not live in Italy and am not really fluent in Italian it may be a waste of money to send me the book in paper. I propose that WMIT saves that money and, if it is ever made available in electronic format, please let me know.

Best regards! --Hispalois (talk) 20:41, 27 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Stone bridge.png[edit]

Copyright status: File:Stone bridge.png

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Stone bridge.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:Mdaniels5757. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 17:32, 16 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Mdaniels5757: I see. Looking better at the user account it is actually not really clear whether the user is really the author or not - it is expected so, but many other images are likely NASA images. I see you asked him for more information. Thank you for pointing this out. Unless the user provides more information (either changing the license, confirming its authorship or pointing to a public domain source), I support the nomination for deletion. - Laurentius (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I just looked into it more, it looks like it came from [1], so it is a copyright violation. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 15:42, 17 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Mdaniels5757: It looks so. Thank you for spotting it! - Laurentius (talk) 17:02, 17 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Stone bridge.png[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Stone bridge.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Mdaniels5757 (talk) 15:41, 17 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

House of the Prince of Naples in Pompeii[edit]

Yesterday, I completed an extensive article about the House of the Prince of Naples (Casa del Principe di Napoli) for English Wikipedia with much of it based on my English translation of the German text "Hauser in Pompeji: Casa del Principe di Napoli" by Volker Michael Strocka. I thought you might be interested in this as a basis for an article about this house in Pompeii for Italian Wikipedia. I was discussing the article with Andrew Wallace-Hadrill, an English archaeologist who has worked extensively in Pompeii and Herculaneum and he asked me if I had gotten permission from Massimo Osanna to upload the pictures of the Roman wall paintings to Wikimedia Commons. I explained to Professor Wallace-Hadrill that under U.S. copyright law, such photographs of two-dimensional artwork that is in the public domain are considered to be slavish copies and that is the position of English Wikipedia and no further permission is required. For the sake of courtesy, though, should I send a letter or something? Also, How do I change the Pompeii template so it includes a link to the new page? You asked if I could submit my translation of Strocka's text to Wikisource and I have requested permission from OTRS but received no reply. At present I have a .pdf copy online on But, I could convert it to Epub if I receive permission. Perhaps the folks on Wikisource thought it was too academic to be of interest?? I have a copy of the email from Professor Strocka granting me copyright permission to create and share the translation. Is that enough? He is quite elderly now and would probably not understand anything too technologically complex to submit permissions. Recently, a friend asked me to submit some of his photography to Wikimedia Commons and even though I explained the OTRS process to him, even he was confused by the email he received from them and didn't know what to do next. Mharrsch (talk) 22:12, 9 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Buon giorno, Laurentius. Ho letto il suo profilo e non condivido alcune sue affermazioni: idee come la libera condivisione dei contenuti dei nostri progetti: in realtà ha decine di migliaia di immagini a sé riservate - in particolare stemmi di città e di paesi italiani e foto di personalità italiane del Novecento - che non possono essere utilizzate da altre wiki; l'apertura alle modifiche da parte di chiunque: in realtà qualsiasi amministratore, di qualunque wiki, può escludere una pagina dalle modifiche degli IP. Non conosco le modalità di assegnazione delle risorse, ma come membro eletto dalla comunità della Commissione per la distribuzione dei fondi, come lei afferma, ritengo che le sia noto che nulla arriva a molte wiki italiane locali - regionali e iperegionali - anche a quelle che si sforzano per raggiungere e per superare la soglia delle 10.000 voci. Naturalmente io ho votato - anche in memoria delle donne che, fino al 1946, in Italia erano escluse dal voto politico - ma il mio voto è andato altrove. Buon proseguimento.--Fausta Samaritani (talk) 14:56, 21 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]